THE
CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
Immanuel Kant
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION, 1781
Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition,
is called upon to consider questions, which it
cannot decline, as they are presented by its own
nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend
every faculty of the mind.
It falls into this difficulty without any fault
of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot
be dispensed with in the field of experience,
and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at
the same time, insured by experience. With these
principles it rises, in obedience to the laws
of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote
conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in
this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete,
because new questions never cease
to present themselves; and thus it finds itself
compelled to have recourse to principles which
transcend the region of experience, while they
are regarded by common sense without distrust.
It thus falls into confusion and contradictions,
from which it conjectures the presence
of latent errors, which, however, it is unable
to discover, because the principles it employs,
transcending the limits of experience, cannot
be tested by that criterion. The arena of these
endless contests is called Metaphysic.
Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences;
and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly
deserves, so far as regards the high importance
of her object-matter, this title of
honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to
heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron
mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba:
Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens...
Nunc trahor exul, inops.*
*Ovid, Metamorphoses. [xiii, "But late on
the pinnacle of fame, strong in my many sons.
now exiled, penniless."]
|